Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UCSD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UCSD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050025 | CA | 718 beds | Current EBITDA $-219.6M → Pro Forma $-58.6M (+$161.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$3.06B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-219.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$161.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-58.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$117.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$161.1M
Modeled Uplift
$119.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$41.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $119.5M (vs $161.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$61.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$60.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$37.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$2.0M
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$161.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$61.2M$61.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$58.9M$1.7M$60.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$9.4M$27.9M$37.3M$117.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$15.3M$30.6M$45.9M$61.2M$61.2M$61.2M$61.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$15.2M$30.3M$45.5M$60.6M$60.6M$60.6M$60.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$12.4M$24.8M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$980K$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Cumulative$0$43.9M$87.7M$130.6M$161.1M$161.1M$161.1M$161.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $161.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-219.6M$-219.6M-7.2%
Year 1$-226.2M+$107.4M$-118.8M-3.9%
Year 2$-233.0M+$161.1M$-71.9M-2.3%
Year 3$-240.0M+$161.1M$-78.9M-2.6%
Year 4$-247.2M+$161.1M$-86.1M-2.8%
Year 5$-254.6M+$161.1M$-93.5M-3.1%
$-2.20B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.03B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.17B
Value Created
$-93.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-349.8M
Organic Growth
$1.61B
RCM Value Creation
$-93.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$30.6M$45.9M$61.2M$73.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$30.3M$45.5M$60.6M$72.8M
A/R Days Reduction$18.6M$27.9M$37.3M$44.7M
Clean Claim Rate$980K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Total$80.5M$120.8M$161.1M$193.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.2%-11.7%-4.2%3.5%
P33
Net-to-Gross28.3%18.1%24.4%30.0%
P65
Occupancy91.7%60.1%70.4%84.7%
P89
Rev/Bed$4.3M$1.5M$2.0M$3.1M
P83
Exp/Bed$4.6M$1.7M$2.1M$3.2M
P87

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML