Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CPMC-R.K. DAVIES MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CPMC-R.K. DAVIES MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050008 | CA | 105 beds | Current EBITDA $59.9M → Pro Forma $72.7M (+$12.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$243.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$59.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$72.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$12.8M
Modeled Uplift
$8.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.5M (vs $12.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$156K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.9M$4.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.7M$134K$4.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$748K$2.2M$3.0M$9.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$156K$156K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$988K$2.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$78K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K$156K
Cumulative$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.4M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M$12.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x
11.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.5x33% / 4.2x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$59.9M$59.9M24.6%
Year 1$61.7M+$8.5M$70.2M28.8%
Year 2$63.5M+$12.8M$76.3M31.3%
Year 3$65.4M+$12.8M$78.2M32.1%
Year 4$67.4M+$12.8M$80.2M32.9%
Year 5$69.4M+$12.8M$82.2M33.7%
$598.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$904.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$305.8M
Value Created
$82.2M
Exit EBITDA
$95.4M
Organic Growth
$128.2M
RCM Value Creation
$82.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.4M$3.7M$4.9M$5.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$78K$117K$156K$187K
Total$6.4M$9.6M$12.8M$15.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin24.6%-20.8%-4.7%4.2%
P95
Net-to-Gross30.5%17.6%22.3%30.6%
P74
Occupancy41.1%43.7%57.5%72.5%
P20
Rev/Bed$2.3M$550K$984K$2.1M
P81
Exp/Bed$1.8M$624K$1.1M$2.3M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML