Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VISTA HEALTH TEXARKANA 2026-04-26 10:37 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VISTA HEALTH TEXARKANA
CCN 044020 | AR | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $-130K → Pro Forma $493K (+$623K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-130K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$623K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$493K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$451K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$623K
Modeled Uplift
$427K
Risk-Adjusted
-$196K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$235K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$235K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$143K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$623K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$235K$235K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$226K$8K$235K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$107K$143K$451K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$118K$176K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$59K$117K$176K$235K$235K$235K$235K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$95K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$170K$340K$505K$623K$623K$623K$623K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $623K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.7x
Headroom (turns)
134%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 134% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.2x, adding 101.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-130K$-130K-1.1%
Year 1$-134K+$415K$281K2.4%
Year 2$-138K+$623K$485K4.1%
Year 3$-142K+$623K$481K4.1%
Year 4$-146K+$623K$476K4.0%
Year 5$-151K+$623K$472K4.0%
$-1.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.5M
Value Created
$472K
Exit EBITDA
$-207K
Organic Growth
$6.2M
RCM Value Creation
$472K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$118K$176K$235K$282K
Denial Rate Reductio$117K$176K$235K$282K
A/R Days Reduction$72K$107K$143K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$311K$467K$623K$747K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.1%-23.9%-13.6%5.9%
P67
Net-to-Gross48.8%28.0%37.1%48.4%
P75
Occupancy66.4%20.4%37.7%64.8%
P75
Rev/Bed$235K$328K$433K$721K
P8
Exp/Bed$238K$332K$485K$857K
P10

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML