Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGWOODS BEHAVIORAL 2026-04-26 06:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGWOODS BEHAVIORAL
CCN 044019 | AR | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $-977K → Pro Forma $-294K (+$683K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-977K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$683K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-294K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$496K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$683K
Modeled Uplift
$452K
Risk-Adjusted
-$231K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$259K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$257K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$157K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$683K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$259K$259K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$249K$8K$257K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$40K$118K$157K$496K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$65K$129K$194K$259K$259K$259K$259K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$64K$129K$193K$257K$257K$257K$257K
A/R Days Reduction$0$52K$105K$157K$157K$157K$157K$157K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$186K$373K$554K$683K$683K$683K$683K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $683K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-977K$-977K-7.6%
Year 1$-1.0M+$455K$-551K-4.3%
Year 2$-1.0M+$683K$-354K-2.7%
Year 3$-1.1M+$683K$-385K-3.0%
Year 4$-1.1M+$683K$-417K-3.2%
Year 5$-1.1M+$683K$-450K-3.5%
$-9.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-4.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.8M
Value Created
$-450K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.6M
Organic Growth
$6.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-450K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$129K$194K$259K$310K
Denial Rate Reductio$129K$193K$257K$309K
A/R Days Reduction$79K$118K$157K$189K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$341K$512K$683K$820K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.6%-15.7%0.0%9.2%
P42
Net-to-Gross34.6%23.3%30.0%42.6%
P58
Occupancy54.8%23.9%44.9%70.1%
P64
Rev/Bed$162K$305K$447K$708K
P3
Exp/Bed$174K$293K$415K$781K
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML