Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VISTA HEALTH-FORT SMITH 2026-04-26 10:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VISTA HEALTH-FORT SMITH
CCN 044006 | AR | 68 beds | Current EBITDA $1.2M → Pro Forma $2.2M (+$994K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$994K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$725K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$994K
Modeled Uplift
$698K
Risk-Adjusted
-$296K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$378K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$374K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$230K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$994K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$378K$378K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$364K$10K$374K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$58K$172K$230K$725K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$94K$189K$283K$378K$378K$378K$378K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$94K$187K$281K$374K$374K$374K$374K
A/R Days Reduction$0$77K$153K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$271K$541K$806K$994K$994K$994K$994K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $994K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x
9.0x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x
10.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x
11.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
12.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.2M$1.2M6.2%
Year 1$1.2M+$662K$1.9M9.9%
Year 2$1.2M+$994K$2.2M11.9%
Year 3$1.3M+$994K$2.3M12.1%
Year 4$1.3M+$994K$2.3M12.3%
Year 5$1.4M+$994K$2.4M12.5%
$11.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$25.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.2M
Value Created
$2.4M
Exit EBITDA
$1.9M
Organic Growth
$9.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$189K$283K$378K$453K
Denial Rate Reductio$187K$281K$374K$449K
A/R Days Reduction$115K$172K$230K$276K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$15K
Total$497K$745K$994K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.2%-17.4%-3.8%9.2%
P68
Net-to-Gross47.0%23.1%29.4%42.6%
P78
Occupancy74.3%23.9%45.6%67.2%
P82
Rev/Bed$278K$319K$394K$708K
P20
Exp/Bed$261K$301K$396K$781K
P18

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML