Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARKANSAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARKANSAS CHILDRENS HOSPITAL
CCN 043300 | AR | 326 beds | Current EBITDA $60.2M → Pro Forma $100.2M (+$40.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$759.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$60.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$100.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$40.0M
Modeled Uplift
$27.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.9M (vs $40.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$486K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.2M$15.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.6M$418K$15.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.3M$6.9M$9.2M$29.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$486K$486K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.5M$11.3M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M$15.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$243K$486K$486K$486K$486K$486K$486K
Cumulative$0$10.9M$21.8M$32.4M$40.0M$40.0M$40.0M$40.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x
11.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$60.2M$60.2M7.9%
Year 1$62.0M+$26.6M$88.6M11.7%
Year 2$63.9M+$40.0M$103.8M13.7%
Year 3$65.8M+$40.0M$105.7M13.9%
Year 4$67.8M+$40.0M$107.7M14.2%
Year 5$69.8M+$40.0M$109.7M14.5%
$602.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.21B
Exit EV (11x)
$605.2M
Value Created
$109.7M
Exit EBITDA
$95.9M
Organic Growth
$399.5M
RCM Value Creation
$109.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.5M$11.3M$15.0M$18.0M
A/R Days Reduction$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.1M
Clean Claim Rate$243K$365K$486K$583K
Total$20.0M$30.0M$40.0M$47.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.9%-12.8%-1.0%5.8%
P83
Net-to-Gross54.5%21.7%24.5%33.6%
P89
Occupancy70.2%56.3%68.7%73.8%
P56
Rev/Bed$2.3M$961K$1.4M$1.5M
P94
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML