Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 043029 | AR | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $10.1M → Pro Forma $12.0M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$474K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$726K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$719K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$442K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$726K$726K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$699K$20K$719K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$111K$330K$442K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$182K$363K$545K$726K$726K$726K$726K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$180K$359K$539K$719K$719K$719K$719K
A/R Days Reduction$0$147K$295K$442K$442K$442K$442K$442K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$520K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.1M$10.1M27.9%
Year 1$10.4M+$1.3M$11.7M32.3%
Year 2$10.8M+$1.9M$12.7M34.9%
Year 3$11.1M+$1.9M$13.0M35.8%
Year 4$11.4M+$1.9M$13.3M36.7%
Year 5$11.7M+$1.9M$13.7M37.6%
$101.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$150.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.9M
Value Created
$13.7M
Exit EBITDA
$16.1M
Organic Growth
$19.1M
RCM Value Creation
$13.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$363K$545K$726K$871K
Denial Rate Reductio$359K$539K$719K$863K
A/R Days Reduction$221K$331K$442K$530K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$955K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin27.9%-15.7%0.0%9.2%
P94
Net-to-Gross56.9%23.3%30.0%42.6%
P86
Occupancy91.3%23.9%44.9%70.1%
P92
Rev/Bed$454K$305K$447K$708K
P50
Exp/Bed$327K$293K$415K$781K
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML