Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH REHABILITATION INSTIT 2026-04-26 04:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH REHABILITATION INSTIT
CCN 043026 | AR | 120 beds | Current EBITDA $2.9M → Pro Forma $5.1M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$760K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$823K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$815K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$501K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$823K$823K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$792K$23K$815K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$126K$374K$501K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$206K$411K$617K$823K$823K$823K$823K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$204K$407K$611K$815K$815K$815K$815K
A/R Days Reduction$0$167K$334K$501K$501K$501K$501K$501K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$589K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x73% / 15.3x
9.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
10.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
12.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
25%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 25% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.9M$2.9M7.1%
Year 1$3.0M+$1.4M$4.4M10.8%
Year 2$3.1M+$2.2M$5.2M12.7%
Year 3$3.2M+$2.2M$5.3M13.0%
Year 4$3.3M+$2.2M$5.4M13.2%
Year 5$3.4M+$2.2M$5.5M13.4%
$29.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$60.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.8M
Value Created
$5.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.6M
Organic Growth
$21.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$411K$617K$823K$988K
Denial Rate Reductio$407K$611K$815K$978K
A/R Days Reduction$250K$376K$501K$601K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.1%-11.6%2.6%7.7%
P70
Net-to-Gross29.9%23.3%29.9%39.8%
P48
Occupancy44.1%41.5%60.5%74.3%
P27
Rev/Bed$343K$343K$604K$1.3M
P24
Exp/Bed$319K$303K$660K$1.3M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML