Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH EXTENDED CARE 2026-04-27 01:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH EXTENDED CARE
CCN 042012 | AR | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.1M → Pro Forma $-1.5M (+$628K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 042012

BAPTIST HEALTH EXTENDED CARE
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$11.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$628K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$455K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$628K
Modeled Uplift
$417K
Risk-Adjusted
-$211K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$237K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$237K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$144K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$628K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$237K$237K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$229K$8K$237K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$108K$144K$455K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$119K$178K$237K$237K$237K$237K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$59K$118K$178K$237K$237K$237K$237K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$96K$144K$144K$144K$144K$144K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$172K$343K$510K$628K$628K$628K$628K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $628K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.1M$-2.1M-17.7%
Year 1$-2.2M+$419K$-1.7M-14.7%
Year 2$-2.2M+$628K$-1.6M-13.5%
Year 3$-2.3M+$628K$-1.7M-14.1%
Year 4$-2.4M+$628K$-1.7M-14.7%
Year 5$-2.4M+$628K$-1.8M-15.3%
$-21.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-19.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.1M
Value Created
$-1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.4M
Organic Growth
$6.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$119K$178K$237K$285K
Denial Rate Reductio$118K$178K$237K$284K
A/R Days Reduction$72K$108K$144K$173K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$314K$471K$628K$754K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 60 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-17.7%-23.9%-13.9%1.9%
P40
Net-to-Gross22.5%28.4%36.2%48.9%
P15
Occupancy47.8%20.3%34.0%60.2%
P65
Rev/Bed$330K$351K$525K$771K
P20
Exp/Bed$388K$377K$646K$935K
P28

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML