Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS DUBUIS HOSPITAL OF FORT SMI 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHRISTUS DUBUIS HOSPITAL OF FORT SMI
CCN 042008 | AR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $865K → Pro Forma $1.4M (+$491K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$9.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$865K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$491K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+534bps
Margin Improvement
$353K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$491K
Modeled Uplift
$345K
Risk-Adjusted
-$146K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$185K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$184K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$112K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+10bp
Total EBITDA Impact$491K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$177K$8K$185K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$184K$184K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$28K$84K$112K$353K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$46K$93K$139K$185K$185K$185K$185K
Cost to Collect$0$46K$92K$138K$184K$184K$184K$184K
A/R Days Reduction$0$37K$75K$112K$112K$112K$112K$112K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$134K$269K$398K$491K$491K$491K$491K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $491K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
9.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
10.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
11.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 7.0x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$865K$865K9.4%
Year 1$890K+$327K$1.2M13.2%
Year 2$917K+$491K$1.4M15.3%
Year 3$945K+$491K$1.4M15.6%
Year 4$973K+$491K$1.5M15.9%
Year 5$1.0M+$491K$1.5M16.2%
$8.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$16.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.8M
Value Created
$1.5M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$4.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$93K$139K$185K$222K
Cost to Collect$92K$138K$184K$221K
A/R Days Reduction$56K$84K$112K$134K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$245K$368K$491K$589K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.4%-24.4%-14.4%-1.1%
P87
Net-to-Gross48.2%28.9%36.2%48.8%
P72
Occupancy66.8%20.3%34.1%56.0%
P89
Rev/Bed$368K$367K$596K$794K
P26
Exp/Bed$333K$404K$703K$987K
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML