Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UNITY HEALTH - NEWPORT 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UNITY HEALTH - NEWPORT
CCN 041332 | AR | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $159K → Pro Forma $475K (+$316K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$159K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$316K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$475K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+545bps
Margin Improvement
$223K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$316K
Modeled Uplift
$217K
Risk-Adjusted
-$99K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$120K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$116K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$71K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+17bp
Total EBITDA Impact$316K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$112K$8K$120K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$116K$116K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$18K$53K$71K$223K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$30K$60K$90K$120K$120K$120K$120K
Cost to Collect$0$29K$58K$87K$116K$116K$116K$116K
A/R Days Reduction$0$24K$47K$71K$71K$71K$71K$71K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$87K$175K$257K$316K$316K$316K$316K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $316K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.4x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.5x
9.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x
10.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.3x
11.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x
12.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$159K$159K2.7%
Year 1$164K+$211K$374K6.5%
Year 2$168K+$316K$485K8.4%
Year 3$173K+$316K$490K8.4%
Year 4$179K+$316K$495K8.5%
Year 5$184K+$316K$500K8.6%
$1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$5.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$3.9M
Value Created
$500K
Exit EBITDA
$253K
Organic Growth
$3.2M
RCM Value Creation
$500K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$60K$90K$120K$144K
Cost to Collect$58K$87K$116K$139K
A/R Days Reduction$35K$53K$71K$85K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$158K$237K$316K$380K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-23.7%-13.9%-0.5%
P79
Net-to-Gross33.5%29.2%37.1%48.2%
P40
Occupancy64.0%20.3%34.1%55.3%
P83
Rev/Bed$242K$374K$630K$943K
P8
Exp/Bed$235K$406K$760K$1.0M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML