Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BHMC-HEBER SPRINGS 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BHMC-HEBER SPRINGS
CCN 041312 | AR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $84K (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$84K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$974K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$814K
Risk-Adjusted
-$521K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$508K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$503K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$309K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$508K$508K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$489K$14K$503K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$78K$231K$309K$974K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$127K$254K$381K$508K$508K$508K$508K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$126K$251K$377K$503K$503K$503K$503K
A/R Days Reduction$0$103K$206K$309K$309K$309K$309K$309K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$364K$727K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-126.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
132.9x
Headroom (turns)
2044%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2044% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -126.4x, adding 225.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-4.9%
Year 1$-1.3M+$890K$-399K-1.6%
Year 2$-1.3M+$1.3M$8K0.0%
Year 3$-1.4M+$1.3M$-32K-0.1%
Year 4$-1.4M+$1.3M$-73K-0.3%
Year 5$-1.5M+$1.3M$-116K-0.5%
$-12.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.2M
Value Created
$-116K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$13.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-116K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$254K$381K$508K$609K
Denial Rate Reductio$251K$377K$503K$603K
A/R Days Reduction$154K$232K$309K$371K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$668K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.9%-24.4%-14.4%-1.1%
P64
Net-to-Gross27.3%28.9%36.2%48.8%
P17
Occupancy14.6%20.3%34.1%56.0%
P19
Rev/Bed$1.0M$367K$596K$794K
P83
Exp/Bed$1.1M$404K$703K$987K
P77

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML