Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STONE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STONE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 041310 | AR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $302K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$978K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$302K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$978K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$713K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$978K
Modeled Uplift
$603K
Risk-Adjusted
-$375K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$372K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$368K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$226K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$978K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$372K$372K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$358K$10K$368K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$169K$226K$713K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$93K$186K$279K$372K$372K$372K$372K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$151K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$266K$533K$793K$978K$978K$978K$978K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $978K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x96% / 28.9x101% / 32.5x105% / 36.0x107% / 37.8x109% / 39.6x
9.0x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.5x100% / 31.7x102% / 33.2x103% / 34.8x
10.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.0x
11.0x82% / 20.1x87% / 22.7x91% / 25.3x93% / 26.6x95% / 27.9x
12.0x79% / 18.2x83% / 20.6x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x91% / 25.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.5x
Headroom (turns)
69%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 69% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.0x, adding 6.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$302K$302K1.6%
Year 1$311K+$652K$963K5.2%
Year 2$321K+$978K$1.3M7.0%
Year 3$330K+$978K$1.3M7.0%
Year 4$340K+$978K$1.3M7.1%
Year 5$350K+$978K$1.3M7.1%
$3.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.6M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$481K
Organic Growth
$9.8M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$186K$279K$372K$446K
Denial Rate Reductio$184K$276K$368K$442K
A/R Days Reduction$113K$170K$226K$271K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$489K$733K$978K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.6%-24.4%-14.4%-1.1%
P77
Net-to-Gross30.1%28.9%36.2%48.8%
P32
Occupancy19.6%20.3%34.1%56.0%
P23
Rev/Bed$743K$367K$596K$794K
P72
Exp/Bed$731K$404K$703K$987K
P51

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML