Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LAWRENCE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 041309 | AR | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.5M → Pro Forma $-7.9M (+$564K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$564K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$407K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$564K
Modeled Uplift
$341K
Risk-Adjusted
-$223K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$213K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$212K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$129K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$564K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$204K$8K$213K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$212K$212K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$33K$97K$129K$407K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$53K$106K$160K$213K$213K$213K$213K
Cost to Collect$0$53K$106K$159K$212K$212K$212K$212K
A/R Days Reduction$0$43K$86K$129K$129K$129K$129K$129K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$154K$308K$458K$564K$564K$564K$564K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $564K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.5M$-8.5M-79.7%
Year 1$-8.7M+$376K$-8.3M-78.5%
Year 2$-9.0M+$564K$-8.4M-79.2%
Year 3$-9.2M+$564K$-8.7M-81.7%
Year 4$-9.5M+$564K$-9.0M-84.3%
Year 5$-9.8M+$564K$-9.2M-87.0%
$-84.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-101.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$-17.1M
Value Created
$-9.2M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.5M
Organic Growth
$5.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-9.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$106K$160K$213K$255K
Cost to Collect$106K$159K$212K$255K
A/R Days Reduction$65K$97K$129K$155K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$282K$423K$564K$677K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 53 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-24.4%-14.4%-1.1%
P0
Net-to-Gross52.9%28.9%36.2%48.8%
P89
Occupancy20.5%20.3%34.1%56.0%
P28
Rev/Bed$425K$367K$596K$794K
P40
Exp/Bed$763K$404K$703K$987K
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML