Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARKANSAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARKANSAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 040147 | AR | 47 beds | Current EBITDA $8.8M → Pro Forma $12.7M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$75.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$914K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$48K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$41K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$231K$684K$914K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$48K$48K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$376K$751K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$372K$744K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$305K$609K$914K$914K$914K$914K$914K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K$48K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.8M$8.8M11.7%
Year 1$9.0M+$2.6M$11.6M15.5%
Year 2$9.3M+$4.0M$13.2M17.6%
Year 3$9.6M+$4.0M$13.5M18.0%
Year 4$9.9M+$4.0M$13.8M18.4%
Year 5$10.1M+$4.0M$14.1M18.8%
$87.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$155.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$67.6M
Value Created
$14.1M
Exit EBITDA
$13.9M
Organic Growth
$39.5M
RCM Value Creation
$14.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$751K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$744K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$457K$686K$914K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$48K$58K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.7%-24.0%-11.5%6.0%
P84
Net-to-Gross28.9%28.7%38.0%48.9%
P27
Occupancy28.0%20.5%41.8%65.9%
P37
Rev/Bed$1.6M$325K$441K$722K
P94
Exp/Bed$1.4M$330K$503K$862K
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML