Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - LR 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - LR
CCN 040114 | AR | 718 beds | Current EBITDA $-35.4M → Pro Forma $-1.0M (+$34.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$652.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-35.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$34.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$25.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$34.3M
Modeled Uplift
$22.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $22.1M (vs $34.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$418K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$34.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.1M$13.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$12.6M$359K$12.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.0M$5.9M$7.9M$25.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$418K$418K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.3M$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M$13.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.2M$6.5M$9.7M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M$12.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$209K$418K$418K$418K$418K$418K$418K
Cumulative$0$9.4M$18.7M$27.8M$34.3M$34.3M$34.3M$34.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $34.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-35.4M$-35.4M-5.4%
Year 1$-36.4M+$22.9M$-13.5M-2.1%
Year 2$-37.5M+$34.3M$-3.2M-0.5%
Year 3$-38.7M+$34.3M$-4.3M-0.7%
Year 4$-39.8M+$34.3M$-5.5M-0.8%
Year 5$-41.0M+$34.3M$-6.7M-1.0%
$-353.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-73.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$280.4M
Value Created
$-6.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-56.3M
Organic Growth
$343.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-6.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.5M$9.8M$13.1M$15.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.5M$9.7M$12.9M$15.5M
A/R Days Reduction$4.0M$6.0M$7.9M$9.5M
Clean Claim Rate$209K$313K$418K$501K
Total$17.2M$25.8M$34.3M$41.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 510 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.4%-15.2%-4.9%4.0%
P48
Net-to-Gross24.6%20.4%26.5%31.9%
P40
Occupancy66.4%66.2%75.0%82.5%
P26
Rev/Bed$909K$1.3M$1.8M$2.4M
P7
Exp/Bed$959K$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P11

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML