Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER OF ARKANSAS 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEDICAL CENTER OF ARKANSAS
CCN 040088 | AR | 105 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.2M → Pro Forma $-3.9M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$62.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$756K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$34K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$191K$565K$756K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$311K$621K$932K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$307K$615K$922K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$252K$504K$756K$756K$756K$756K$756K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$890K$1.8M$2.6M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.2M$-7.2M-11.6%
Year 1$-7.4M+$2.2M$-5.3M-8.5%
Year 2$-7.7M+$3.3M$-4.4M-7.1%
Year 3$-7.9M+$3.3M$-4.6M-7.4%
Year 4$-8.1M+$3.3M$-4.9M-7.8%
Year 5$-8.4M+$3.3M$-5.1M-8.2%
$-72.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-56.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.1M
Value Created
$-5.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.5M
Organic Growth
$32.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-5.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$621K$932K$1.2M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$615K$922K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$378K$567K$756K$907K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.6M$2.5M$3.3M$3.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-11.6%-12.4%0.6%6.8%
P31
Net-to-Gross12.6%23.2%30.0%40.2%
P6
Occupancy37.8%31.3%52.0%72.9%
P28
Rev/Bed$592K$328K$561K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$660K$315K$651K$1.2M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML