Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NATIONAL PARK MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040078 | AR | 126 beds | Current EBITDA $3.1M → Pro Forma $9.4M (+$6.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$118.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$6.3M
Modeled Uplift
$4.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.2M (vs $6.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$76K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.4M$2.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$65K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$365K$1.1M$1.4M$4.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$76K$76K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$594K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$588K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$482K$964K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K$76K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.1M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.4x90% / 25.0x92% / 26.2x94% / 27.5x
9.0x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 23.0x89% / 24.1x
10.0x72% / 15.2x77% / 17.3x81% / 19.3x83% / 20.3x84% / 21.4x
11.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.3x79% / 18.2x80% / 19.1x
12.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
57%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 57% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.1M$3.1M2.6%
Year 1$3.2M+$4.2M$7.4M6.2%
Year 2$3.3M+$6.3M$9.6M8.1%
Year 3$3.4M+$6.3M$9.7M8.1%
Year 4$3.5M+$6.3M$9.8M8.2%
Year 5$3.6M+$6.3M$9.9M8.3%
$31.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$108.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$77.4M
Value Created
$9.9M
Exit EBITDA
$5.0M
Organic Growth
$62.5M
RCM Value Creation
$9.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$723K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$57K$76K$91K
Total$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 34 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.6%-11.8%1.9%7.5%
P50
Net-to-Gross9.5%23.4%29.2%39.7%
P0
Occupancy46.9%38.7%57.7%73.9%
P38
Rev/Bed$943K$343K$646K$1.3M
P65
Exp/Bed$918K$307K$668K$1.2M
P59

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML