Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY HOSPITAL FORT SMITH
CCN 040062 | AR | 256 beds | Current EBITDA $61.8M → Pro Forma $85.3M (+$23.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$447.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$61.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$85.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$23.5M
Modeled Uplift
$16.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.8M (vs $23.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$286K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.9M$8.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.6M$246K$8.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.1M$5.4M$17.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$286K$286K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M$8.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$143K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Cumulative$0$6.4M$12.8M$19.1M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$61.8M$61.8M13.8%
Year 1$63.6M+$15.7M$79.3M17.7%
Year 2$65.6M+$23.5M$89.1M19.9%
Year 3$67.5M+$23.5M$91.0M20.4%
Year 4$69.5M+$23.5M$93.1M20.8%
Year 5$71.6M+$23.5M$95.2M21.3%
$617.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.05B
Exit EV (11x)
$428.8M
Value Created
$95.2M
Exit EBITDA
$98.4M
Organic Growth
$235.2M
RCM Value Creation
$95.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.5M$6.7M$8.9M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.6M$8.9M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.1M$5.4M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$143K$215K$286K$343K
Total$11.8M$17.6M$23.5M$28.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 19 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.8%-12.5%0.2%6.6%
P89
Net-to-Gross27.4%21.3%23.9%32.8%
P63
Occupancy74.8%53.9%65.8%70.5%
P79
Rev/Bed$1.7M$893K$1.2M$1.4M
P89
Exp/Bed$1.5M$971K$1.3M$1.5M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML