Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - FS 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAPTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER - FS
CCN 040055 | AR | 320 beds | Current EBITDA $-36.7M → Pro Forma $-22.0M (+$14.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$279.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-36.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$14.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-22.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$14.7M
Modeled Uplift
$9.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $9.6M (vs $14.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$179K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$14.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.6M$5.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.4M$153K$5.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$856K$2.5M$3.4M$10.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$179K$179K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$89K$179K$179K$179K$179K$179K$179K
Cumulative$0$4.0M$8.0M$11.9M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M$14.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $14.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-36.7M$-36.7M-13.1%
Year 1$-37.8M+$9.8M$-28.0M-10.0%
Year 2$-38.9M+$14.7M$-24.2M-8.7%
Year 3$-40.1M+$14.7M$-25.4M-9.1%
Year 4$-41.3M+$14.7M$-26.6M-9.5%
Year 5$-42.5M+$14.7M$-27.9M-10.0%
$-366.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-306.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$60.5M
Value Created
$-27.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-58.4M
Organic Growth
$146.8M
RCM Value Creation
$-27.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.8M$4.1M$5.5M$6.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M
Clean Claim Rate$89K$134K$179K$214K
Total$7.3M$11.0M$14.7M$17.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.1%-12.8%-1.0%5.8%
P22
Net-to-Gross14.5%21.7%24.5%33.6%
P6
Occupancy51.9%56.3%68.7%73.8%
P6
Rev/Bed$872K$961K$1.4M$1.5M
P11
Exp/Bed$987K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML