Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DREW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DREW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
CCN 040051 | AR | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.6M → Pro Forma $-7.8M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$667K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$707K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$700K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$430K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$707K$707K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$680K$19K$700K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$108K$322K$430K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$177K$353K$530K$707K$707K$707K$707K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$175K$350K$525K$700K$700K$700K$700K
A/R Days Reduction$0$143K$287K$430K$430K$430K$430K$430K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$506K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.6M$-9.6M-27.2%
Year 1$-9.9M+$1.2M$-8.7M-24.5%
Year 2$-10.2M+$1.9M$-8.3M-23.6%
Year 3$-10.5M+$1.9M$-8.7M-24.5%
Year 4$-10.8M+$1.9M$-9.0M-25.4%
Year 5$-11.2M+$1.9M$-9.3M-26.3%
$-96.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-102.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$-6.0M
Value Created
$-9.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.3M
Organic Growth
$18.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-9.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$353K$530K$707K$848K
Denial Rate Reductio$350K$525K$700K$840K
A/R Days Reduction$215K$323K$430K$516K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$930K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-27.2%-24.0%-13.4%6.0%
P17
Net-to-Gross32.8%28.4%38.0%48.5%
P42
Occupancy35.7%20.4%39.8%65.3%
P47
Rev/Bed$721K$331K$441K$722K
P73
Exp/Bed$918K$334K$503K$862K
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML