Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040041 | AR | 137 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $11.2M (+$5.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$94.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$5.0M
Modeled Uplift
$3.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.2M (vs $5.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$60K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$52K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$289K$858K$1.1M$3.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$60K$60K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$472K$943K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$467K$934K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$383K$765K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$30K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.7M$4.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
9.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x
11.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
12.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M6.7%
Year 1$6.5M+$3.3M$9.8M10.4%
Year 2$6.7M+$5.0M$11.6M12.3%
Year 3$6.9M+$5.0M$11.8M12.5%
Year 4$7.1M+$5.0M$12.0M12.8%
Year 5$7.3M+$5.0M$12.2M13.0%
$62.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$134.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$71.9M
Value Created
$12.2M
Exit EBITDA
$10.0M
Organic Growth
$49.6M
RCM Value Creation
$12.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$943K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$934K$1.4M$1.9M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$574K$861K$1.1M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$30K$45K$60K$72K
Total$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 31 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.7%-11.7%1.2%7.4%
P68
Net-to-Gross11.1%23.8%28.5%38.6%
P3
Occupancy41.5%39.6%54.8%73.7%
P26
Rev/Bed$688K$343K$688K$1.4M
P48
Exp/Bed$643K$311K$675K$1.4M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML