Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040022 | AR | 321 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $17.5M (+$15.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$293.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$15.4M
Modeled Uplift
$10.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.2M (vs $15.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$188K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.9M$5.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.6M$161K$5.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$899K$2.7M$3.6M$11.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$188K$188K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT33.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$94K$188K$188K$188K$188K$188K$188K
Cumulative$0$4.2M$8.4M$12.5M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M$15.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x126% / 58.5x131% / 65.3x135% / 72.2x138% / 75.6x140% / 79.0x
9.0x120% / 51.6x125% / 57.7x130% / 63.8x132% / 66.8x134% / 69.9x
10.0x115% / 46.1x120% / 51.6x125% / 57.1x127% / 59.8x129% / 62.6x
11.0x111% / 41.6x116% / 46.6x120% / 51.6x122% / 54.1x124% / 56.6x
12.0x107% / 37.9x112% / 42.5x116% / 47.0x118% / 49.3x120% / 51.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.5x
Headroom (turns)
84%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 84% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.0x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M0.7%
Year 1$2.2M+$10.3M$12.5M4.3%
Year 2$2.2M+$15.4M$17.7M6.0%
Year 3$2.3M+$15.4M$17.7M6.1%
Year 4$2.4M+$15.4M$17.8M6.1%
Year 5$2.5M+$15.4M$17.9M6.1%
$21.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$196.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$175.4M
Value Created
$17.9M
Exit EBITDA
$3.4M
Organic Growth
$154.2M
RCM Value Creation
$17.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.9M$4.4M$5.8M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$94K$141K$188K$225K
Total$7.7M$11.6M$15.4M$18.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.7%-12.8%-1.0%5.8%
P56
Net-to-Gross11.9%21.7%24.5%33.6%
P0
Occupancy54.9%56.3%68.7%73.8%
P22
Rev/Bed$913K$961K$1.4M$1.5M
P17
Exp/Bed$907K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML