Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040010 | AR | 236 beds | Current EBITDA $28.1M → Pro Forma $47.4M (+$19.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$366.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$28.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$47.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$19.3M
Modeled Uplift
$13.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.5M (vs $19.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$235K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.3M$7.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.1M$202K$7.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.5M$14.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$235K$235K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M$7.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$117K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K$235K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.5M$15.6M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M$19.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$28.1M$28.1M7.7%
Year 1$29.0M+$12.9M$41.9M11.4%
Year 2$29.9M+$19.3M$49.2M13.4%
Year 3$30.8M+$19.3M$50.1M13.6%
Year 4$31.7M+$19.3M$51.0M13.9%
Year 5$32.6M+$19.3M$51.9M14.2%
$281.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$571.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$289.7M
Value Created
$51.9M
Exit EBITDA
$44.8M
Organic Growth
$192.9M
RCM Value Creation
$51.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.5M$7.3M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.4M$7.3M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$117K$176K$235K$282K
Total$9.6M$14.5M$19.3M$23.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.7%-12.5%0.7%6.6%
P83
Net-to-Gross22.6%21.3%24.5%32.8%
P30
Occupancy68.0%46.2%60.5%70.3%
P61
Rev/Bed$1.6M$783K$1.0M$1.4M
P83
Exp/Bed$1.4M$876K$1.1M$1.4M
P74

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML