Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST VINCENT INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST VINCENT INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040007 | AR | 379 beds | Current EBITDA $-117.7M → Pro Forma $-97.1M (+$20.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$392.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-117.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$20.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-97.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$20.7M
Modeled Uplift
$13.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.9M (vs $20.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$251K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$20.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.9M$7.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.6M$216K$7.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.6M$4.8M$15.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$251K$251K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M$7.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M$7.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$126K$251K$251K$251K$251K$251K$251K
Cumulative$0$5.6M$11.3M$16.8M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M$20.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $20.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-117.7M$-117.7M-30.0%
Year 1$-121.3M+$13.8M$-107.5M-27.4%
Year 2$-124.9M+$20.7M$-104.2M-26.5%
Year 3$-128.6M+$20.7M$-108.0M-27.5%
Year 4$-132.5M+$20.7M$-111.8M-28.5%
Year 5$-136.5M+$20.7M$-115.8M-29.5%
$-1.18B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.27B
Exit EV (11x)
$-96.7M
Value Created
$-115.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-187.5M
Organic Growth
$206.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-115.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.9M$5.9M$7.9M$9.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.9M$5.8M$7.8M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$126K$188K$251K$302K
Total$10.3M$15.5M$20.7M$24.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-30.0%-11.7%-1.0%7.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross21.4%21.7%24.5%31.8%
P21
Occupancy64.6%57.3%68.7%73.7%
P29
Rev/Bed$1.0M$910K$1.1M$1.5M
P43
Exp/Bed$1.3M$965K$1.2M$1.4M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML