Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 06:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 040004 | AR | 377 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.8M → Pro Forma $10.7M (+$18.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$352.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$18.6M
Modeled Uplift
$12.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.0M (vs $18.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$226K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$194K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$226K$226K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$113K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.1M$15.0M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
12.6x
Headroom (turns)
195%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 195% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.1x, adding 105.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.8M$-7.8M-2.2%
Year 1$-8.0M+$12.4M$4.3M1.2%
Year 2$-8.3M+$18.6M$10.3M2.9%
Year 3$-8.5M+$18.6M$10.0M2.8%
Year 4$-8.8M+$18.6M$9.8M2.8%
Year 5$-9.1M+$18.6M$9.5M2.7%
$-78.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$104.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$182.7M
Value Created
$9.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-12.4M
Organic Growth
$185.6M
RCM Value Creation
$9.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$113K$169K$226K$271K
Total$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$22.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 14 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.2%-11.7%-1.0%7.4%
P43
Net-to-Gross21.2%21.7%24.5%31.8%
P14
Occupancy53.3%57.3%68.7%73.7%
P14
Rev/Bed$936K$910K$1.1M$1.5M
P36
Exp/Bed$957K$965K$1.2M$1.4M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML