Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DESTINY SPRINGS HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DESTINY SPRINGS HEALTHCARE
CCN 034034 | AZ | 90 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $9.4M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$396K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$608K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$602K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$370K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$608K$608K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$585K$17K$602K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$277K$370K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$152K$304K$456K$608K$608K$608K$608K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$151K$301K$452K$602K$602K$602K$602K
A/R Days Reduction$0$123K$247K$370K$370K$370K$370K$370K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$436K$871K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M25.6%
Year 1$8.0M+$1.1M$9.1M29.9%
Year 2$8.3M+$1.6M$9.9M32.5%
Year 3$8.5M+$1.6M$10.1M33.3%
Year 4$8.8M+$1.6M$10.4M34.1%
Year 5$9.0M+$1.6M$10.6M35.0%
$78.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$117.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.1M
Value Created
$10.6M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$16.0M
RCM Value Creation
$10.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$304K$456K$608K$730K
Denial Rate Reductio$301K$452K$602K$723K
A/R Days Reduction$185K$278K$370K$444K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$19K$23K
Total$800K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 56 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.6%-10.9%-0.8%8.6%
P92
Net-to-Gross54.5%20.1%29.8%46.2%
P80
Occupancy100.0%40.9%57.2%74.2%
P98
Rev/Bed$338K$272K$529K$1.2M
P41
Exp/Bed$251K$291K$490K$1.3M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML