Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OASIS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OASIS BEHAVIORAL HEALTH
CCN 034029 | AZ | 158 beds | Current EBITDA $10.0M → Pro Forma $12.3M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$42.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$592K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$852K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$844K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$519K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$27K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$852K$852K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$820K$23K$844K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$131K$388K$519K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$27K$27K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$213K$426K$639K$852K$852K$852K$852K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$211K$422K$633K$844K$844K$844K$844K
A/R Days Reduction$0$173K$346K$519K$519K$519K$519K$519K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K$27K
Cumulative$0$610K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
9.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
10.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x
11.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x28% / 3.5x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.0M$10.0M23.5%
Year 1$10.3M+$1.5M$11.8M27.7%
Year 2$10.6M+$2.2M$12.9M30.2%
Year 3$10.9M+$2.2M$13.2M31.0%
Year 4$11.3M+$2.2M$13.5M31.7%
Year 5$11.6M+$2.2M$13.9M32.5%
$100.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$152.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$52.2M
Value Created
$13.9M
Exit EBITDA
$16.0M
Organic Growth
$22.4M
RCM Value Creation
$13.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$426K$639K$852K$1.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$422K$633K$844K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$259K$389K$519K$622K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$20K$27K$33K
Total$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin23.5%-7.5%-0.3%11.4%
P90
Net-to-Gross41.8%17.0%25.9%36.7%
P81
Occupancy93.1%55.4%65.8%78.1%
P91
Rev/Bed$270K$316K$1.2M$1.8M
P12
Exp/Bed$206K$328K$1.1M$1.8M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML