Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DIGNITY HEALTH EAST VALLEY REHAB HOS 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DIGNITY HEALTH EAST VALLEY REHAB HOS
CCN 033040 | AZ | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $7.9M → Pro Forma $9.5M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$383K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$604K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$598K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$367K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$604K$604K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$581K$17K$598K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$93K$275K$367K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$151K$302K$453K$604K$604K$604K$604K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$149K$299K$448K$598K$598K$598K$598K
A/R Days Reduction$0$122K$245K$367K$367K$367K$367K$367K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$433K$865K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.9M$7.9M26.0%
Year 1$8.1M+$1.1M$9.2M30.3%
Year 2$8.3M+$1.6M$9.9M32.9%
Year 3$8.6M+$1.6M$10.2M33.7%
Year 4$8.9M+$1.6M$10.4M34.6%
Year 5$9.1M+$1.6M$10.7M35.5%
$78.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$117.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$39.1M
Value Created
$10.7M
Exit EBITDA
$12.5M
Organic Growth
$15.9M
RCM Value Creation
$10.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$302K$453K$604K$725K
Denial Rate Reductio$299K$448K$598K$718K
A/R Days Reduction$184K$276K$367K$441K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$794K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin26.0%-10.4%-0.4%7.1%
P94
Net-to-Gross48.1%19.9%33.7%51.6%
P71
Occupancy92.5%33.1%52.0%71.4%
P96
Rev/Bed$604K$301K$573K$1.3M
P55
Exp/Bed$447K$340K$624K$1.7M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML