Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH VALLEY OF THE SUN R 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH VALLEY OF THE SUN R
CCN 033032 | AZ | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $845K → Pro Forma $2.0M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$22.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$845K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$867K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$780K
Risk-Adjusted
-$408K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$452K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$447K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$275K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$452K$452K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$435K$12K$447K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$69K$206K$275K$867K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$113K$226K$339K$452K$452K$452K$452K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$112K$224K$336K$447K$447K$447K$447K
A/R Days Reduction$0$92K$183K$275K$275K$275K$275K$275K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$324K$647K$964K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.5x77% / 17.6x81% / 19.7x83% / 20.7x85% / 21.8x
9.0x68% / 13.4x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.1x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.1x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.8x
11.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.2x72% / 14.9x
12.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x64% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$845K$845K3.7%
Year 1$870K+$792K$1.7M7.4%
Year 2$896K+$1.2M$2.1M9.2%
Year 3$923K+$1.2M$2.1M9.3%
Year 4$951K+$1.2M$2.1M9.5%
Year 5$979K+$1.2M$2.2M9.6%
$8.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$23.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.4M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$1.3M
Organic Growth
$11.9M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$226K$339K$452K$542K
Denial Rate Reductio$224K$336K$447K$537K
A/R Days Reduction$137K$206K$275K$330K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$14K$17K
Total$594K$892K$1.2M$1.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-10.8%2.4%10.2%
P59
Net-to-Gross64.4%20.2%31.1%53.9%
P88
Occupancy54.4%39.9%56.0%74.1%
P47
Rev/Bed$301K$274K$452K$1.1M
P29
Exp/Bed$290K$297K$502K$1.4M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML