Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 21:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 033025 | AZ | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $532K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$21.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$532K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$820K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$757K
Risk-Adjusted
-$367K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$427K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$423K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$260K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$14K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$427K$427K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$411K$12K$423K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$66K$194K$260K$820K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$14K$14K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$107K$214K$321K$427K$427K$427K$427K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$106K$212K$317K$423K$423K$423K$423K
A/R Days Reduction$0$87K$173K$260K$260K$260K$260K$260K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K$14K
Cumulative$0$306K$612K$912K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.7x88% / 23.3x92% / 26.0x94% / 27.3x96% / 28.6x
9.0x78% / 18.0x83% / 20.4x87% / 22.7x89% / 23.9x91% / 25.1x
10.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 18.0x82% / 20.1x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x
11.0x70% / 14.2x74% / 16.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 19.0x82% / 19.9x
12.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.2x77% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$532K$532K2.5%
Year 1$548K+$749K$1.3M6.1%
Year 2$565K+$1.1M$1.7M7.9%
Year 3$582K+$1.1M$1.7M8.0%
Year 4$599K+$1.1M$1.7M8.1%
Year 5$617K+$1.1M$1.7M8.1%
$5.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.8M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$848K
Organic Growth
$11.2M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$214K$321K$427K$513K
Denial Rate Reductio$212K$317K$423K$508K
A/R Days Reduction$130K$195K$260K$312K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$10K$14K$16K
Total$562K$843K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.5%-8.8%3.3%8.9%
P47
Net-to-Gross68.4%19.1%29.8%54.2%
P91
Occupancy58.3%40.6%56.4%72.8%
P50
Rev/Bed$356K$267K$446K$1.0M
P40
Exp/Bed$347K$300K$493K$1.3M
P35

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML