Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SSH - PHOENIX 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SSH - PHOENIX
CCN 032001 | AZ | 48 beds | Current EBITDA $1.0M → Pro Forma $2.5M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$27.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$406K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$550K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$544K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$335K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$550K$550K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$529K$15K$544K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$84K$250K$335K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$137K$275K$412K$550K$550K$550K$550K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$136K$272K$408K$544K$544K$544K$544K
A/R Days Reduction$0$112K$223K$335K$335K$335K$335K$335K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$394K$788K$1.2M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.5x81% / 19.6x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.7x
9.0x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x
10.0x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.4x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.9x76% / 16.7x
11.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.4x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x
12.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 4.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.0M$1.0M3.8%
Year 1$1.1M+$964K$2.0M7.4%
Year 2$1.1M+$1.4M$2.5M9.3%
Year 3$1.1M+$1.4M$2.6M9.4%
Year 4$1.2M+$1.4M$2.6M9.5%
Year 5$1.2M+$1.4M$2.6M9.6%
$10.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$29.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.8M
Value Created
$2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$1.6M
Organic Growth
$14.5M
RCM Value Creation
$2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$275K$412K$550K$660K
Denial Rate Reductio$272K$408K$544K$653K
A/R Days Reduction$167K$251K$335K$401K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$723K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.8%-11.1%-1.1%6.3%
P67
Net-to-Gross13.7%20.0%35.9%51.2%
P10
Occupancy74.2%32.5%52.0%67.9%
P83
Rev/Bed$573K$284K$579K$1.3M
P47
Exp/Bed$551K$334K$736K$1.7M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML