Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARONDELET HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARONDELET HOLY CROSS HOSPITAL
CCN 031313 | AZ | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $11.7M → Pro Forma $13.7M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$11.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$743K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$789K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$781K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$480K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$789K$789K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$760K$22K$781K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$121K$359K$480K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$197K$395K$592K$789K$789K$789K$789K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$195K$391K$586K$781K$781K$781K$781K
A/R Days Reduction$0$160K$320K$480K$480K$480K$480K$480K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$565K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$11.7M$11.7M29.6%
Year 1$12.0M+$1.4M$13.4M33.9%
Year 2$12.4M+$2.1M$14.4M36.6%
Year 3$12.7M+$2.1M$14.8M37.6%
Year 4$13.1M+$2.1M$15.2M38.5%
Year 5$13.5M+$2.1M$15.6M39.5%
$116.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$171.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$54.9M
Value Created
$15.6M
Exit EBITDA
$18.6M
Organic Growth
$20.8M
RCM Value Creation
$15.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$395K$592K$789K$947K
Denial Rate Reductio$391K$586K$781K$938K
A/R Days Reduction$240K$360K$480K$576K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$30K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.6%-10.1%-1.8%7.9%
P97
Net-to-Gross16.6%19.3%36.6%48.8%
P14
Occupancy31.1%17.6%38.3%67.9%
P33
Rev/Bed$1.6M$442K$1.0M$2.0M
P65
Exp/Bed$1.1M$505K$1.2M$2.5M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML