Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COPPER QUEEN COMM. HOSP. 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COPPER QUEEN COMM. HOSP.
CCN 031312 | AZ | 14 beds | Current EBITDA $4.2M → Pro Forma $7.5M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$63.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$773K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$41K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$195K$578K$773K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$41K$41K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$318K$635K$953K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$314K$629K$943K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$258K$515K$773K$773K$773K$773K$773K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K
Cumulative$0$910K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.2x72% / 15.0x74% / 15.8x
9.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
10.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x
11.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
12.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.8x
Headroom (turns)
27%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 27% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.7x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.2M$4.2M6.6%
Year 1$4.3M+$2.2M$6.6M10.3%
Year 2$4.5M+$3.3M$7.8M12.3%
Year 3$4.6M+$3.3M$7.9M12.5%
Year 4$4.7M+$3.3M$8.1M12.7%
Year 5$4.9M+$3.3M$8.2M12.9%
$42.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$90.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.3M
Value Created
$8.2M
Exit EBITDA
$6.7M
Organic Growth
$33.4M
RCM Value Creation
$8.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$635K$953K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$629K$943K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$386K$580K$773K$927K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$41K$49K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.6%-10.8%-4.1%3.3%
P74
Net-to-Gross26.0%22.8%36.7%48.6%
P26
Occupancy34.5%14.0%34.9%48.9%
P43
Rev/Bed$4.5M$1.0M$1.6M$2.0M
P92
Exp/Bed$4.2M$1.1M$1.6M$3.1M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML