Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER SAHUARITA 2026-04-26 09:32 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER SAHUARITA
CCN 030148 | AZ | 70 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.0M → Pro Forma $-6.9M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$39.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$767K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$796K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$788K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$484K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$25K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$796K$796K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$766K$22K$788K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$122K$362K$484K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$25K$25K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$199K$398K$597K$796K$796K$796K$796K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$197K$394K$591K$788K$788K$788K$788K
A/R Days Reduction$0$161K$323K$484K$484K$484K$484K$484K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K$25K
Cumulative$0$570K$1.1M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.0M$-9.0M-22.6%
Year 1$-9.3M+$1.4M$-7.9M-19.8%
Year 2$-9.6M+$2.1M$-7.5M-18.8%
Year 3$-9.8M+$2.1M$-7.8M-19.5%
Year 4$-10.1M+$2.1M$-8.0M-20.2%
Year 5$-10.4M+$2.1M$-8.4M-21.0%
$-90.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-91.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.8M
Value Created
$-8.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-14.4M
Organic Growth
$20.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$398K$597K$796K$955K
Denial Rate Reductio$394K$591K$788K$945K
A/R Days Reduction$242K$363K$484K$581K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$19K$25K$31K
Total$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.6%-10.2%2.5%9.4%
P9
Net-to-Gross10.4%21.1%33.1%54.3%
P4
Occupancy33.6%40.1%56.4%74.1%
P21
Rev/Bed$568K$271K$449K$1.0M
P54
Exp/Bed$697K$291K$485K$1.4M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML