Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BANNER UNIVERSITY MED CENTER SOUTH 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BANNER UNIVERSITY MED CENTER SOUTH
CCN 030111 | AZ | 132 beds | Current EBITDA $-31.1M → Pro Forma $-21.0M (+$10.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$190.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-31.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-21.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$10.0M
Modeled Uplift
$7.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.3M (vs $10.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$122K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.8M$3.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.7M$105K$3.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$586K$1.7M$2.3M$7.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$122K$122K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$955K$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$945K$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M$3.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$774K$1.5M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$61K$122K$122K$122K$122K$122K$122K
Cumulative$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.1M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M$10.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-31.1M$-31.1M-16.3%
Year 1$-32.0M+$6.7M$-25.3M-13.3%
Year 2$-33.0M+$10.0M$-22.9M-12.0%
Year 3$-34.0M+$10.0M$-23.9M-12.5%
Year 4$-35.0M+$10.0M$-24.9M-13.1%
Year 5$-36.0M+$10.0M$-26.0M-13.6%
$-310.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-285.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.9M
Value Created
$-26.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-49.5M
Organic Growth
$100.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-26.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.9M$2.9M$3.8M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.9M$2.8M$3.8M$4.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$61K$92K$122K$147K
Total$5.0M$7.5M$10.0M$12.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.3%-6.6%-0.8%10.2%
P7
Net-to-Gross25.7%16.9%25.7%36.9%
P49
Occupancy74.1%50.1%62.2%77.2%
P67
Rev/Bed$1.4M$312K$1.0M$1.6M
P64
Exp/Bed$1.7M$328K$1.0M$1.7M
P73

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML