Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE CORE INSTITUTE SPECIALTY HOSPITA 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE CORE INSTITUTE SPECIALTY HOSPITA
CCN 030108 | AZ | 28 beds | Current EBITDA $8.4M → Pro Forma $13.1M (+$4.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$91.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$4.8M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$58K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.8M$50K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$280K$830K$1.1M$3.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$58K$58K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$456K$912K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$451K$903K$1.4M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$370K$740K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$29K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K$58K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M$4.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.7x
9.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
10.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x
11.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x
12.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.1x
Headroom (turns)
17%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 17% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.4x, adding 3.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.4M$8.4M9.2%
Year 1$8.6M+$3.2M$11.8M12.9%
Year 2$8.9M+$4.8M$13.7M15.0%
Year 3$9.1M+$4.8M$13.9M15.3%
Year 4$9.4M+$4.8M$14.2M15.6%
Year 5$9.7M+$4.8M$14.5M15.9%
$83.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$159.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$75.8M
Value Created
$14.5M
Exit EBITDA
$13.3M
Organic Growth
$48.0M
RCM Value Creation
$14.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$912K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$903K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$555K$832K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$29K$44K$58K$70K
Total$2.4M$3.6M$4.8M$5.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin9.2%-10.2%-1.8%8.5%
P76
Net-to-Gross19.2%19.4%36.6%50.0%
P21
Occupancy8.1%19.1%41.0%68.4%
P4
Rev/Bed$3.3M$367K$960K$1.8M
P92
Exp/Bed$3.0M$484K$1.2M$2.6M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML