Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AZ SPINE & JOINT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AZ SPINE & JOINT HOSPITAL
CCN 030107 | AZ | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $8.7M → Pro Forma $11.1M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$45.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$900K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$902K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$893K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$549K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$29K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$902K$902K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$869K$25K$893K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$138K$411K$549K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$29K$29K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$226K$451K$677K$902K$902K$902K$902K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$223K$447K$670K$893K$893K$893K$893K
A/R Days Reduction$0$183K$366K$549K$549K$549K$549K$549K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K$29K
Cumulative$0$646K$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.7M$8.7M19.4%
Year 1$9.0M+$1.6M$10.6M23.5%
Year 2$9.3M+$2.4M$11.6M25.8%
Year 3$9.6M+$2.4M$11.9M26.4%
Year 4$9.8M+$2.4M$12.2M27.1%
Year 5$10.1M+$2.4M$12.5M27.7%
$87.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$137.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$50.2M
Value Created
$12.5M
Exit EBITDA
$13.9M
Organic Growth
$23.7M
RCM Value Creation
$12.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$451K$677K$902K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$447K$670K$893K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$275K$412K$549K$659K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$22K$29K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.4%-10.0%-2.8%8.8%
P93
Net-to-Gross19.7%19.7%41.0%52.7%
P24
Occupancy15.9%16.1%35.1%61.4%
P22
Rev/Bed$2.0M$484K$1.1M$2.0M
P70
Exp/Bed$1.6M$725K$1.5M$3.1M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML