Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ABRAZO ARROWHEAD CAMPUS 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ABRAZO ARROWHEAD CAMPUS
CCN 030094 | AZ | 270 beds | Current EBITDA $47.6M → Pro Forma $69.0M (+$21.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$406.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$47.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$69.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$21.4M
Modeled Uplift
$14.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.9M (vs $21.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$260K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.1M$8.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.8M$224K$8.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.7M$4.9M$15.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$260K$260K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M$8.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.6M$3.3M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M$4.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$130K$260K$260K$260K$260K$260K$260K
Cumulative$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.3M$21.4M$21.4M$21.4M$21.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$47.6M$47.6M11.7%
Year 1$49.0M+$14.3M$63.3M15.6%
Year 2$50.5M+$21.4M$71.9M17.7%
Year 3$52.0M+$21.4M$73.4M18.1%
Year 4$53.6M+$21.4M$74.9M18.4%
Year 5$55.2M+$21.4M$76.5M18.8%
$475.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$842.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$366.1M
Value Created
$76.5M
Exit EBITDA
$75.8M
Organic Growth
$213.8M
RCM Value Creation
$76.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$9.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.0M$6.0M$8.0M$9.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.7M$4.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$130K$195K$260K$312K
Total$10.7M$16.0M$21.4M$25.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 38 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.7%-6.2%-1.0%6.3%
P78
Net-to-Gross10.4%16.3%20.7%31.1%
P3
Occupancy65.8%56.6%66.5%79.6%
P47
Rev/Bed$1.5M$870K$1.5M$1.9M
P51
Exp/Bed$1.3M$813K$1.3M$1.9M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML