Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BANNER DEL E WEBB MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BANNER DEL E WEBB MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030093 | AZ | 312 beds | Current EBITDA $493K → Pro Forma $19.1M (+$18.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$353.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$493K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$19.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$18.6M
Modeled Uplift
$12.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.8M (vs $18.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$226K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$194K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$226K$226K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$113K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.1M$15.1M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M$18.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x209% / 280.9x215% / 312.5x222% / 344.0x224% / 359.8x227% / 375.6x
9.0x202% / 249.3x208% / 277.4x214% / 305.4x217% / 319.5x220% / 333.5x
10.0x195% / 224.1x202% / 249.3x207% / 274.6x210% / 287.2x213% / 299.8x
11.0x190% / 203.4x196% / 226.4x202% / 249.3x204% / 260.8x207% / 272.3x
12.0x184% / 186.2x191% / 207.2x196% / 228.3x199% / 238.8x202% / 249.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
0.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.3x
Headroom (turns)
97%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 97% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 0.2x, adding 8.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$493K$493K0.1%
Year 1$508K+$12.4M$12.9M3.7%
Year 2$523K+$18.6M$19.1M5.4%
Year 3$539K+$18.6M$19.1M5.4%
Year 4$555K+$18.6M$19.2M5.4%
Year 5$572K+$18.6M$19.2M5.4%
$4.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$210.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$205.9M
Value Created
$19.2M
Exit EBITDA
$786K
Organic Growth
$186.0M
RCM Value Creation
$19.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$113K$170K$226K$271K
Total$9.3M$13.9M$18.6M$22.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.1%-4.2%-0.8%6.3%
P52
Net-to-Gross20.7%16.2%20.7%29.3%
P48
Occupancy65.5%59.2%66.5%78.7%
P41
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.3M$1.6M$2.0M
P19
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.1M$1.4M$2.0M
P25

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML