Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ABRAZO SCOTTSDALE CAMPUS 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ABRAZO SCOTTSDALE CAMPUS
CCN 030083 | AZ | 128 beds | Current EBITDA $2.8M → Pro Forma $9.0M (+$6.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$117.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$6.2M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $6.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$75K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.3M$2.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.3M$65K$2.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$360K$1.1M$1.4M$4.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$75K$75K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$587K$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$581K$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$476K$952K$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$38K$75K$75K$75K$75K$75K$75K
Cumulative$0$1.7M$3.4M$5.0M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M$6.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x84% / 21.1x88% / 23.8x93% / 26.5x95% / 27.9x96% / 29.2x
9.0x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.8x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x
10.0x75% / 16.2x79% / 18.4x83% / 20.6x85% / 21.6x87% / 22.7x
11.0x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
12.0x67% / 13.0x71% / 14.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.8x
Headroom (turns)
59%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 59% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.7x, adding 5.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.8M$2.8M2.4%
Year 1$2.9M+$4.1M$7.0M6.0%
Year 2$3.0M+$6.2M$9.2M7.8%
Year 3$3.1M+$6.2M$9.3M7.9%
Year 4$3.2M+$6.2M$9.4M8.0%
Year 5$3.3M+$6.2M$9.5M8.1%
$28.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$104.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$75.7M
Value Created
$9.5M
Exit EBITDA
$4.5M
Organic Growth
$61.7M
RCM Value Creation
$9.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.8M$2.3M$2.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$714K$1.1M$1.4M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$38K$56K$75K$90K
Total$3.1M$4.6M$6.2M$7.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 48 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.4%-6.3%1.9%10.2%
P51
Net-to-Gross10.1%17.2%25.7%36.9%
P4
Occupancy39.4%49.8%61.2%77.2%
P15
Rev/Bed$917K$312K$1.0M$1.5M
P44
Exp/Bed$895K$328K$993K$1.6M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML