Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAVASU REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030069 | AZ | 144 beds | Current EBITDA $43.2M → Pro Forma $56.7M (+$13.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$256.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$43.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$56.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$13.5M
Modeled Uplift
$8.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.8M (vs $13.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$164K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$141K$5.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$786K$2.3M$3.1M$9.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$164K$164K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$82K$164K$164K$164K$164K$164K$164K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.3M$10.9M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$43.2M$43.2M16.9%
Year 1$44.5M+$9.0M$53.5M20.9%
Year 2$45.8M+$13.5M$59.3M23.2%
Year 3$47.2M+$13.5M$60.7M23.7%
Year 4$48.6M+$13.5M$62.1M24.3%
Year 5$50.1M+$13.5M$63.6M24.8%
$432.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$699.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$267.1M
Value Created
$63.6M
Exit EBITDA
$68.8M
Organic Growth
$134.7M
RCM Value Creation
$63.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$82K$123K$164K$197K
Total$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$16.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 46 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.9%-6.2%1.9%11.1%
P84
Net-to-Gross17.5%16.6%25.7%36.4%
P28
Occupancy36.6%52.2%63.8%76.7%
P9
Rev/Bed$1.8M$309K$1.1M$1.7M
P74
Exp/Bed$1.5M$326K$1.1M$1.7M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML