Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BANNER DESERT MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BANNER DESERT MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030065 | AZ | 629 beds | Current EBITDA $105.4M → Pro Forma $149.2M (+$43.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$833.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$105.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$43.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$149.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$32.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$43.8M
Modeled Uplift
$29.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$14.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.6M (vs $43.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$16.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$16.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$533K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$43.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$16.7M$16.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$16.0M$458K$16.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.6M$7.6M$10.1M$32.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$533K$533K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.2M$8.3M$12.5M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.1M$8.2M$12.4M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M$16.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M$10.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$267K$533K$533K$533K$533K$533K$533K
Cumulative$0$11.9M$23.9M$35.5M$43.8M$43.8M$43.8M$43.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $43.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$105.4M$105.4M12.6%
Year 1$108.5M+$29.2M$137.7M16.5%
Year 2$111.8M+$43.8M$155.6M18.7%
Year 3$115.1M+$43.8M$159.0M19.1%
Year 4$118.6M+$43.8M$162.4M19.5%
Year 5$122.1M+$43.8M$166.0M19.9%
$1.05B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.83B
Exit EV (11x)
$772.1M
Value Created
$166.0M
Exit EBITDA
$167.8M
Organic Growth
$438.3M
RCM Value Creation
$166.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$8.3M$12.5M$16.7M$20.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.2M$12.4M$16.5M$19.8M
A/R Days Reduction$5.1M$7.6M$10.1M$12.2M
Clean Claim Rate$267K$400K$533K$640K
Total$21.9M$32.9M$43.8M$52.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.6%-4.6%-1.4%6.3%
P82
Net-to-Gross23.6%16.3%24.0%28.0%
P41
Occupancy72.9%55.7%72.5%81.2%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.3M$1.6M$2.6M
P29
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.1M$1.4M$1.8M
P29

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML