Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BANNER BOSWELL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BANNER BOSWELL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030061 | AZ | 410 beds | Current EBITDA $-25.7M → Pro Forma $-6.9M (+$18.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$356.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-25.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-6.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$18.8M
Modeled Uplift
$12.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.3M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.5M (vs $18.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$228K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$196K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$228K$228K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$114K$228K$228K$228K$228K$228K$228K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.2M$18.8M$18.8M$18.8M$18.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-25.7M$-25.7M-7.2%
Year 1$-26.5M+$12.5M$-14.0M-3.9%
Year 2$-27.3M+$18.8M$-8.5M-2.4%
Year 3$-28.1M+$18.8M$-9.3M-2.6%
Year 4$-28.9M+$18.8M$-10.2M-2.8%
Year 5$-29.8M+$18.8M$-11.0M-3.1%
$-257.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-121.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$135.8M
Value Created
$-11.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-40.9M
Organic Growth
$187.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-11.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.1M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$114K$171K$228K$274K
Total$9.4M$14.1M$18.8M$22.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-7.2%-4.6%-1.0%6.3%
P16
Net-to-Gross18.8%16.1%23.3%27.4%
P36
Occupancy62.6%59.5%65.8%78.0%
P32
Rev/Bed$870K$1.3M$1.6M$2.1M
P8
Exp/Bed$933K$1.1M$1.4M$2.0M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML