Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CANYON VISTA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030043 | AZ | 74 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $9.5M (+$7.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$132.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$7.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$85K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$73K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$407K$1.2M$1.6M$5.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$85K$85K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$663K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$657K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$538K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$42K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.4x99% / 31.6x101% / 33.1x103% / 34.7x
9.0x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.9x94% / 27.7x96% / 29.1x98% / 30.5x
10.0x81% / 19.5x86% / 22.1x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.9x94% / 27.1x
11.0x77% / 17.5x82% / 19.8x86% / 22.1x88% / 23.2x89% / 24.4x
12.0x74% / 15.7x78% / 17.9x82% / 20.0x84% / 21.0x86% / 22.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
65%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 65% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M1.9%
Year 1$2.6M+$4.7M$7.3M5.5%
Year 2$2.7M+$7.0M$9.7M7.3%
Year 3$2.8M+$7.0M$9.8M7.4%
Year 4$2.9M+$7.0M$9.8M7.4%
Year 5$3.0M+$7.0M$9.9M7.5%
$25.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$109.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$83.8M
Value Created
$9.9M
Exit EBITDA
$4.1M
Organic Growth
$69.8M
RCM Value Creation
$9.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$807K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$42K$64K$85K$102K
Total$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 55 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.9%-10.8%2.4%10.2%
P47
Net-to-Gross22.9%20.2%31.1%53.9%
P35
Occupancy53.9%39.9%56.0%74.1%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.8M$274K$452K$1.1M
P92
Exp/Bed$1.8M$297K$502K$1.4M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML