Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ABRAZO CENTRAL CAMPUS 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ABRAZO CENTRAL CAMPUS
CCN 030030 | AZ | 153 beds | Current EBITDA $-11.5M → Pro Forma $-5.8M (+$5.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$108.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-11.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$5.7M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$69K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$60K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$333K$987K$1.3M$4.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$69K$69K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$542K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$537K$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$440K$880K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$35K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K$69K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.6M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-11.5M$-11.5M-10.6%
Year 1$-11.8M+$3.8M$-8.0M-7.4%
Year 2$-12.2M+$5.7M$-6.5M-6.0%
Year 3$-12.6M+$5.7M$-6.9M-6.3%
Year 4$-12.9M+$5.7M$-7.2M-6.7%
Year 5$-13.3M+$5.7M$-7.6M-7.0%
$-115.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-83.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$31.1M
Value Created
$-7.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-18.3M
Organic Growth
$57.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-7.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$660K$990K$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$35K$52K$69K$83K
Total$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 42 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.6%-8.0%-0.9%12.1%
P20
Net-to-Gross9.2%16.8%25.9%36.2%
P2
Occupancy47.9%54.9%65.8%77.8%
P10
Rev/Bed$709K$311K$1.2M$1.7M
P35
Exp/Bed$784K$326K$1.1M$1.7M
P40

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML