Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — YAVAPAI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — YAVAPAI REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 030012 | AZ | 218 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.9M → Pro Forma $14.1M (+$24.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$456.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$24.0M
Modeled Uplift
$17.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$6.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.6M (vs $24.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$292K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.1M$9.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.8M$251K$9.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.6M$17.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$292K$292K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M$9.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M$5.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$146K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K$292K
Cumulative$0$6.5M$13.1M$19.5M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M$24.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
12.5x
Headroom (turns)
192%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 192% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.0x, adding 105.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.9M$-9.9M-2.2%
Year 1$-10.2M+$16.0M$5.8M1.3%
Year 2$-10.5M+$24.0M$13.5M3.0%
Year 3$-10.9M+$24.0M$13.2M2.9%
Year 4$-11.2M+$24.0M$12.8M2.8%
Year 5$-11.5M+$24.0M$12.5M2.7%
$-99.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$137.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$237.1M
Value Created
$12.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.8M
Organic Growth
$240.4M
RCM Value Creation
$12.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$6.9M$9.1M$11.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.5M$6.8M$9.0M$10.9M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.6M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$146K$219K$292K$351K
Total$12.0M$18.0M$24.0M$28.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 40 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.2%-6.2%-0.3%6.3%
P32
Net-to-Gross27.4%16.3%20.5%34.4%
P61
Occupancy78.0%55.9%65.8%78.1%
P72
Rev/Bed$2.1M$709K$1.4M$1.9M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.1M$523K$1.3M$1.8M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML