Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CARONDELET ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CARONDELET ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL
CCN 030011 | AZ | 451 beds | Current EBITDA $-9.9M → Pro Forma $3.9M (+$13.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$261.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-9.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$10.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$13.8M
Modeled Uplift
$8.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.3M (vs $13.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$167K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.2M$5.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.0M$144K$5.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$803K$2.4M$3.2M$10.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$167K$167K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$84K$167K$167K$167K$167K$167K$167K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.5M$11.2M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M$13.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-21.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
27.8x
Headroom (turns)
428%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 428% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -21.3x, adding 120.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-9.9M$-9.9M-3.8%
Year 1$-10.1M+$9.2M$-973K-0.4%
Year 2$-10.5M+$13.8M$3.3M1.3%
Year 3$-10.8M+$13.8M$3.0M1.1%
Year 4$-11.1M+$13.8M$2.7M1.0%
Year 5$-11.4M+$13.8M$2.3M0.9%
$-98.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$25.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$124.2M
Value Created
$2.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-15.7M
Organic Growth
$137.6M
RCM Value Creation
$2.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M
Clean Claim Rate$84K$126K$167K$201K
Total$6.9M$10.3M$13.8M$16.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.8%-5.2%-1.0%6.2%
P30
Net-to-Gross11.1%16.2%23.3%26.9%
P9
Occupancy35.1%58.9%65.7%77.8%
P4
Rev/Bed$580K$1.3M$1.6M$2.2M
P4
Exp/Bed$602K$1.2M$1.4M$2.0M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML