Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTRAL PENINSULA GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTRAL PENINSULA GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 020024 | AK | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $14.1M → Pro Forma $27.6M (+$13.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$255.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$13.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

79%
Realization (B)
$13.4M
Modeled Uplift
$10.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.8M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 79% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $10.6M (vs $13.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$163K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$13.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$5.1M$5.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.9M$140K$5.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$783K$2.3M$3.1M$9.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$163K$163K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M$3.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$82K$163K$163K$163K$163K$163K$163K
Cumulative$0$3.7M$7.3M$10.9M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M$13.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $13.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.4x77% / 17.3x
9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
10.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
11.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
12.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
33%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 33% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.1M$14.1M5.5%
Year 1$14.6M+$8.9M$23.5M9.2%
Year 2$15.0M+$13.4M$28.4M11.1%
Year 3$15.5M+$13.4M$28.9M11.3%
Year 4$15.9M+$13.4M$29.3M11.5%
Year 5$16.4M+$13.4M$29.8M11.7%
$141.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$328.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$186.6M
Value Created
$29.8M
Exit EBITDA
$22.5M
Organic Growth
$134.2M
RCM Value Creation
$29.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.6M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.6M$2.3M$3.1M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$82K$122K$163K$196K
Total$6.7M$10.1M$13.4M$16.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2673 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.5%-16.7%-4.1%7.1%
P73
Net-to-Gross42.8%27.0%37.6%52.4%
P60
Occupancy78.7%26.5%45.5%66.6%
P87
Rev/Bed$5.2M$435K$870K$1.8M
P99
Exp/Bed$4.9M$446K$965K$1.8M
P98

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML