Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:18 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALASKA REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 020017 | AK | 169 beds | Current EBITDA $144.4M → Pro Forma $163.1M (+$18.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$355.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$144.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$163.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$18.7M
Modeled Uplift
$13.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.8M (vs $18.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$227K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.1M$7.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$195K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$227K$227K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$114K$227K$227K$227K$227K$227K$227K
Cumulative$0$5.1M$10.2M$15.2M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M$18.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$144.4M$144.4M40.6%
Year 1$148.7M+$12.5M$161.2M45.4%
Year 2$153.2M+$18.7M$171.9M48.4%
Year 3$157.8M+$18.7M$176.5M49.7%
Year 4$162.5M+$18.7M$181.2M51.0%
Year 5$167.4M+$18.7M$186.1M52.4%
$1.44B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.05B
Exit EV (11x)
$602.9M
Value Created
$186.1M
Exit EBITDA
$230.0M
Organic Growth
$186.9M
RCM Value Creation
$186.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.2M$4.3M$5.2M
Clean Claim Rate$114K$171K$227K$273K
Total$9.3M$14.0M$18.7M$22.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2013 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin40.6%-14.0%-3.8%6.3%
P99
Net-to-Gross18.2%19.0%27.0%36.1%
P23
Occupancy72.8%49.3%62.5%75.3%
P70
Rev/Bed$2.1M$629K$1.3M$1.8M
P84
Exp/Bed$1.2M$650K$1.2M$1.8M
P50

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML